Battery electric vehicles are redrawing the industrial landscape. In the first seven months of 2025, European carmakers recorded a 38 percent increase in BEV sales. The market share of electric cars climbed to 16.6 percent, up from 13.2 percent the year before. Chinese newcomer BYD has overtaken Tesla in European registrations, shifting the balance of power in a market long dominated by established players. At the same time, German producer prices fell by 2.2% in August, signaling that many raw material and component costs are under pressure.
.png?width=3000&height=2000&name=240919_EV_Market_2025_Image1%20(1).png)
These signals tell a story of disruption on multiple fronts. Demand for electric cars is accelerating even as traditional internal combustion models lose ground. Competitive dynamics are shifting, with agile new entrants gaining ground on legacy manufacturers. And cost structures are pulling in opposite directions: certain industrial inputs are getting cheaper, while batteries and specialized EV components remain expensive. For cost engineers, this mix is rewriting the basic arithmetic of manufacturing.
From Steady to Volatile
For decades, cost modeling in automotive manufacturing rested on relatively stable assumptions. Steel and aluminum followed cyclical but predictable patterns. Economies of scale in internal combustion engines drove down unit costs. Suppliers and OEMs negotiated on familiar ground. That foundation is now cracking.
The surge in EV demand brings new complexity. Instead of steady platforms and volumes, OEMs are rushing dozens of new electric models to market, fragmenting production. New entrants such as BYD are competing with lean, EV-centric cost structures, while established manufacturers carry the overhead of both ICE and EV production. In parallel, material prices are slipping downward, forcing suppliers to adjust quotations and leaving little room for inefficiencies. The math is no longer linear.
The Hidden Pressure in the Numbers
A 2.2% fall in producer prices may seem small on paper, but in cost engineering terms it can swing negotiations and margins significantly. If suppliers adjust their prices downward, manufacturers must reflect this in their own quotations or risk being priced out. At the same time, the rapid expansion of EV production introduces costly elements such as battery packs, inverters, and rare earth materials that are far less elastic. One side of the equation is easing while the other tightens.
This tension explains why traditional methods of costing, especially Excel-based models with infrequent updates, are increasingly unfit for purpose. A spreadsheet built on last year’s assumptions risks overestimating costs in some areas while underestimating them in others. The result is bids that miss the mark, either by eroding margins or by losing contracts outright.
Why It Matters Now
The disruption is not a distant forecast. It is happening in real time, with BEV adoption rising quarter by quarter and new entrants reshaping the market. The European Union is tightening its regulatory net with CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism), the Battery Regulation, and IMDS 15, thereby embedding carbon as an additional cost dimension. For cost engineers, this means the “math” is no longer a single formula. It is a moving equation with variables that shift every month: commodity prices, supplier strategies, regulatory costs, and customer expectations.
Adapting the Costing Playbook
To navigate this environment, cost engineers should focus on five priorities:
-
Embed scenario flexibility
Models must be able to test multiple cost paths, from optimistic to conservative. This includes both ICE and EV cost structures, as they now diverge significantly.
-
Refresh data more frequently
Input data on materials, energy, and labor should be updated monthly or quarterly rather than annually. Rapid updates reduce the risk of pricing parts on outdated assumptions.
-
Integrate carbon with cost
Sourcing decisions should reflect both €/unit and kgCO₂e/unit. This dual perspective prepares teams for regulatory requirements and aligns with customer expectations.
-
Demand transparent supplier data
Detailed breakdowns of material, labor, energy, and emissions provide the foundation for accurate should-costing and stronger negotiations.
-
Modernize costing workflows
Collaboration tools and cloud-based software help teams respond faster, maintain version control, and avoid the risks of manual Excel processes.
Conclusion
EV disruption is changing more than the drivetrain. It is altering the economic foundations of manufacturing. Demand, competition, and cost are no longer predictable constants but shifting forces that require agility. For cost engineers, the challenge is clear: build models that can keep pace with disruption, or be left working with numbers that no longer add up.